Critique of heijes paper on cross

Send this info to a friend To:

Critique of heijes paper on cross

How to Write a Summary of an Article? Evaluation of Journal Article: Curacao and the Netherlands, Human Relations, 64 5 We will write a custom essay sample on Evaluation of Journal Article: First of all, the theoretical framework development is briefly examined from dimensional approach to contextual approach.

After that follows the research approaches that Heijes adopted and puts forward the advantages and disadvantages, as well as, considering the limitations of them.

Critique of heijes paper on cross

Eventually, the potential implications for individuals should be involved and particularly whether they positively relates to intercultural working in cross-cultural management. Brief description of the article In this article, Heijes presents a comparative analysis of cross-cultural perception between European Dutch and African Curacaoans in Netherlands and Curacao respectively, as well as including two organizations namely the Internal Revenue Service IRS and the police, each of which owns diverse power dynamics.

In order to provide more exactly evidence, Heijes applied a set of various methods in collecting data. After that, it is followed by participant observation to supply further data.

Then data were categorized into four groups and based on an iterative process for checking and interpreting the findings. As for findings, from the anthropological perspective, Heijes concluded that cross-cultural perception between two ethnic groups that are relatively similar, that is because the same external background of the two countries and differs due to the internal context of two different organizations.

However, the cultural differences were not very much; therefore, the findings indicated that power dynamics plays a crucial role in influencing the cross-cultural perception not only in internal organizational context, but also in external national context.

Request Information

In other words, taking the power dynamics between different groups into consideration is much more essential for determining cross-cultural perception and cooperation than only rely on a value-based approach. Finally, Marrewijk makes clear that power imbalances might influence on cross-cultural perception, as well as bringing about different behaviour determined by using contextual approach.

Having considered all the arguments above, this exploratory article through using comparative analysis of cross-cultural perception and emphasising on various contexts between different organizations and countries, which own different power dynamics, to demonstrate how power differences impact on cross-cultural perception.

For instance, power dynamics and cross-cultural perception are relatively important concepts that the author should be explained.

Moreover, power dynamics, that is, are not very easily to observe and even unconscious occasionally Boonstra and Gravenhorst, As Gajewska-De Mattos et al. In order to demonstrate the research question: Interviews, as one of the most significant sources of the case study information, removed gender within the organization and treated all espondents as male Heijes, In this journal article, the interview started with open-ended questions.

On the other words, the interviewers follow some specific questions that have already prepared and the list of questions needs to be covered during the interview in a particular order. Semi- structured interviews usually last for approximately an hour, which might be in full accordance with that of 80 minutes.

Another question about whether should record the content during the interviews or not. But a recording device is not permitted to use in some particular situations.

In this journal article, the author employed interviewers who differed not only in gender, but also own diverse ethnic background in order to avoid bias of the interviewers; this is a significant way to improve the degree of accuracy.

The participant-observation research method has already widely used in anthropological studies in terms of different cultural or social groups, which is suitable for using in this journal article Becker and Geer, Moreover, one of the most advantages of participant observation is that some topics may be no way to collect information other than through participant-observation Yin, Dewalt as cited in Kawulich, rightly points out that it has ability to enhance the quality of the data collection and interpretation.

However, the limitation of the participant-observation is much obviously.

Critique of heijes paper on cross

That was concluded from the results of the research that cross-cultural perceptions within the groups are relatively similar, that is mainly due to the fact that they own the same national culture and only influenced by the different contexts.

However, in colonial area, the cross-cultural perception was effected by the postcolonial setting as well as the power imbalance. Finally, the findings consistent with the argument, which is power imbalance effects cross-cultural perception, after than lead to different behaviour depending on different contexts.

Considering the main findings and the arguments, it can be concluded that these findings are valid. In terms of Dutch context, the findings illustrate that power dynamics impact on cross-cultural perception not only in organizational contexts but also including the national and postcolonial contexts.

That means we should take both aspect of contexts into consideration when determine the relationship between power imbalance and cross-cultural perception.

Visit Campus

Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that culture contexts are relatively similar between these two groups, and have no impact on the relationship between cross-cultural perception and power dynamics.The purpose of this paper is to critique issue 64 volume 3 of This paper is organized so that description of information is presented about the authors, institutions and topics of each paper, then a synthesis of the teacher education articles, and finally implications for the field of teacher education.

Critique of Heijes Paper on Cross- Cultural Perception and Power Dynamics Across Changing Organisational and National Contexts: Curacao and the Netherlands Criminology Essay Economics Essay.

Sample paper review Paper: A Data Mining Analysis of RTID Alarms Reviewer: XXXXX RATINGS OF PAPER [Please rate the following by entering a score between -3 to 3 with 0 being the average based on.

The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a on his critique. The content of the paper is right on track. A succint summary is provided in the first paragraph.

This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.

How to Write a Critical Essay (with Sample Essays) - wikiHow It can be placed either on the floor or on a table. Its sides are glossy black, while its front, top, and back are glossy white.
Paper Shredders Review - Consumer Reports Research Critique 1 Jamber, E.

of the main points of the paper you chose to critique!) If you cannot write a clear summary, you absolutely cannot begin to critique the paper. 2) Example summary and critique of primary research paper The fertilized eggs of marine snails are often enclosed in complex, leathery egg capsules with 30 or more embryos being confined within each capsule.

Feb 25,  · The Swingline Style+ Super Cross-Cut Shredder is small, stylish, and lightning fast, and it holds more shredded paper than you might expect in its tiny basket. If ever a document shredder could be called stylish, the Swingline Style+ Super Cross-Cut Shredder ($) is it.

Scholarly Article Critique Student Example